INDEPENDENT, INFLUENTIAL , INTELLIGENT
Clarity Amidst the Clutter
Missing-the-Point.net is a premium platform that cuts through the noise of modern policy debates to expose flawed reasoning, false arguments, and conventional wisdom unchallenged. In the crowded marketplace of ideas, too many positions — in business and government — unfortunately miss the point. We do not.
the latest
Critics Miss the Point on Jimmy Kimmel
Why the Debate Over Jimmy Kimmel Gets It Wrong
The backlash against Nexstar and Sinclair for declining to carry Jimmy Kimmel Live! has been loud. Critics frame it as censorship or political pressure. That framing misses the point.
The real issue is responsibility.
- Broadcasters are not streamers. They operate under FCC licenses that obligate them to serve the public interest. Standards matter.
- Advertisers are not optional. Local TV is built on advertising revenue. Brand safety is not a preference—it is a business imperative.
- Audiences are not monolithic. Nexstar and Sinclair serve communities across America. Decisions must reflect diverse viewer expectations, not coastal media consensus.
Calling it “censorship” ignores the fact that Jimmy Kimmel continues to air nationally on ABC.
Nexstar and Sinclair simply exercised their editorial discretion, as broadcasters have done for decades, to protect their audiences and advertisers.
The Point: The decision wasn’t about politics. It was about stewardship—doing what responsible broadcasters are supposed to do. Critics who call it censorship are simply missing the point.
Safety Isn't Partisan
Crime victims don’t ask who sent the help. They ask why it took so long.
The President has turned federal attention to violent hot spots. Washington, D.C. Now, Chicago. That’s not fascism. That’s federalism with urgency. In D.C., the case is clear: the President commands the D.C. National Guard. There is no governor. The authority is explicit. Full stop.
Chicago is different. States control their Guard—unless federalized under specific statutes. The Posse Comitatus Act limits federal troops in civilian law enforcement—unless Congress or the Constitution provides an exception, like the Insurrection Act. Those are real guardrails, not suggestions. Still, the President can surge federal law-enforcement resources, as we’ve seen before. He has done so, and he is pressing to send the Guard to Chicago amid a fresh spike of violence. Debate the wisdom if you like. But the problem on the ground is even more serious than the legal footnotes.
Democrats are pushing back—some on principle, some on reflex. Tenth Amendment. Local control. Fear of federal overreach. All valid concerns. But when opposition becomes posture—“oppose the President, just because”—the point becomes lost. The bigger point is public safety. Salus populi suprema lex. The welfare of the people is the supreme law.
The Constitution anticipated moments like this. It divides power so no one man rules unchecked, yet equips the nation to act when local authority is outgunned. That’s why exceptions to Posse Comitatus exist. That’s why federal forces have stepped in, sparingly, to enforce law or protect rights. Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock to enforce civil rights.
Presidents from both parties have surged agents to crush violent crime. The point is not theater. The point is order. Justice sometimes needs backup.
So what should Democrats do? Don’t surrender your principles. Specify them. Define the mission: violence interdiction and hotspot stabilization. Not general policing. Not immigration enforcement. Not protest control. Put it in writing. Time-bound. Measurable. Sunset after 60 or 90 days unless renewed locally.
Fix the chain of command: local chief in the lead, federal assets in support. Make the rules of engagement clear. Train on civil liberties. Demand transparency: daily stats, body cameras, independent complaint channels. Use what’s lawful where you are.
In D.C., Guard authority is straightforward. In the states, if you won’t consent to Guard deployment, then ask for a federal law-enforcement surge targeted at the worst actors. Results matter more than rhetoric.
If the President’s offer is clumsy, reshape it. If it’s overbroad, narrow it. If it’s unlawful, use lawful tools. But don’t say no because you dislike the messenger. Cui bono if you win the press conference but lose another weekend to gunfire?
The Founders distrusted concentrated power—and disorder. Read your Federalist. Washington marched the militia to quell the Whiskey Rebellion. Eisenhower enforced desegregation with troops. Different centuries, same duty: rivals cooperate to keep the peace.
Leadership means owning outcomes. Set terms. Set metrics. Take lawful help. Then judge by the fruits—lives saved, neighborhoods calmed, children safe to play outside.
Opposing the President just because is missing the point. Safer streets. Fewer funerals. More freedom to live, work, and walk without fear. That’s the headline. Everything else is noise.